Preview

Malignant tumours

Advanced search

Impact of safety parameters and toxicity profile on the efficacy of first-line combination therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a real-world study

https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-050

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of safety parameters and toxicity profile on the efficacy of first-line immuno-oncology (IO) — based therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in real-world clinical practice. 

Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were: age ≥ 18 years, histologically confirmed advanced RCC, and administration of first-line therapy with IO-based combination regimens. Exclusion criteria included contraindications to any combination therapy agents, lack of data on at least one administration of each combination agent, and absence of at least one follow-up examination after treatment initiation. All adverse events (AEs), their characteristics, and instances of treatment regimen modification due to AEs were documented, along with the best overall response to therapy, time to progression, time to death, and last follow-up. An analysis of the potential association between safety parameters and first-line therapy efficacy outcomes was performed. 

Results: Data from 194 patients were included, receiving either nivolumab with ipilimumab (IO — IO), 94 patients (48.5 %) or immuno-targeted therapy (IO — TKI) 100 patients (51.5 %). Median follow-up duration was 28.4 months (1–63 months). The objective response rate (ORR) in the entire population (IO — IO / TKI) was 36.6 %, disease control rate (DCR) was 79.4 %, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.0 months (95 % CI, 15.3–24.8), and median overall survival (OS) was 29.2 months (95 % CI, 24.4–34.0). In the IO — IO / TKI group, independent favorable prognostic factors for therapy efficacy were cutaneous AEs (risk ratio [RR] for ORR 5.9 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 3.1–38.4], p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR] for PFS 2.4 [95 % CI: 1.2–4.6], p = 0.011), endocrine AEs (RR for ORR 2.5 [95 % CI: 1.8–3.5], p = 0.021; OR for PFS 2.6 [95 % CI: 1.4–4.8], p = 0.002; OR for overall survival [OS] 2.6 [95 % CI: 1.5–4.6], p = 0.001), and gastrointestinal (GI) AEs (OR for PFS 1.8 [95 % CI: 1.1–3.2], p = 0.030). Independent unfavorable prognostic factors for OS were serious AEs (OR 24.9 [95 % CI: 4.7–130.5], p < 0.0001).Independent favorable prognostic factors in the IO — IO group were endocrine AEs (OR for PFS 2.1 [95 % CI: 1.1–4.1], p = 0.026; OR for OS 2.8 [95 % CI: 1.4–5.6], p = 0.003), while in the IO — TKI group, favorable prognostic factors included the occurrence of any AEs (OR for OS 2.9 [95 % CI: 1.1–7.5], p = 0.033), cutaneous AEs (RR for ORR 3.1 [95 % CI: 1.2–6.2], p = 0.04; OR for PFS 3.0 [95 % CI: 1.2–7.6], p = 0.021), GI AEs (OR for PFS 3.3 [95 % CI: 1.5–7.2], p = 0.002), and endocrine AEs (OR for PFS 3.3 [95 % CI: 1.6–6.7], p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The development of AEs in patients with RCC is associated with improved efficacy outcomes of IO based combination therapy. The potential use of AEs as biomarkers of clinical benefit from IO-based combination therapy warrants confirmation in prospective studies.

About the Authors

M. I. Volkova
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health ; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Volkova Mariya Igorevna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152

1,2/1 Barrikadnaya St.,Moscow 125993


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



T. A. Nersesova
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Nersesova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



M. A. Lyadova
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health ; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Lyadova Marina Aleksandrovna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152

1,2/1 Barrikadnaya St.,Moscow 125993


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. S. Kuzmina
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Kuzmina Evgeniya Sergeevna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



T. G. Antonova
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Antonova Tatyana Galyautdinovna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. V. Tsareva
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Tsareva Elena Vladimirovna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



O. A. Stativko
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Stativko Olesya Alekseevna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



V. A. Chernyaev
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Chernyaev Vitalii Aleksandrovich

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



I. A. Pokataev
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Pokataev Ilya Anatolevich

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



References

1. Volkova M.I., Nosov D.A., Alekseev B.Ya., et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Practical Recommendations, Part 1.2. Zlokachest-vennie opuholi = Malignant Tumors 2024;14(3s2):207-220 (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-3s2-l.2-08

2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2025. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/nccn-guide-lines

3. Zhou X., Yao Z., Yang H., et al. Are immune-related adverse events associated with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2020;18(l):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/sl2916-020-01549-2

4. Di Fiore F., Rigal O., Menager C., et al. Severe clinical toxicities are correlated with survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib and sorafenib. Br J Cancer 2011;105(l2):1811—3. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.507

5. Ikeda T., Ishihara H., Nemoto Y., et al. Prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Urol Oncol 2021;39(l0):735.e9-735.el6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.012

6. Ebi N., Fnoue H., Igata F., et al. Clinical association between immune-related adverse events and treatment efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab-based therapy. Anticancer Res 2024;44(7):3087-3095. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17122

7. Fndini A., Di Guardo L., Cimminiello C., et al. Immune-related adverse events correlate with improved survival in patients undergoing anti-PDl immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019;145(2):511-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2819-x

8. Nearchou A., Valachis A., Lind P., et al. Acquired hypothyroidism as a predictive marker of outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a literature-based meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015;13(4):280—286. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.clgc.2014.10.002

9. Donskov F., Michaelson M.D., Puzanov I., et al. Sunitinib-associated hypertension and neutropenia as efficacy biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer 2015;113:1571-80. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.368

10. Corona-Rodarte E., Olivas-Martinez A., Remolina-Bonilla Y.A., et al. Do we need skin toxicity? Association of immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related cutaneous adverse events with outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. FntJ Dermatol 2021;60(10):1242-1247. https://doi.org/10.llll/ijd.15583

11. Paderi A., Giorgione R., Giommoni E., et al. Association between immune related adverse events and outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(4):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancersl3040860

12. Martini D.J., Goyal S., Liu Y., et al. Immune-related adverse events as clinical biomarkers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncologist 2021;26(l0):el742-el750. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.l3868

13. Kuronya Z., Szonyi M.D., Nagyivanyi K., et al. Predictive markers of first line pazopanib treatment in kidney cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2020;26(4):2475-2481. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl2253-020-00853-9

14. Wang Y., Abu-Sbeih H., Mao E., et al. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis in patients with advanced malignancies: retrospective review at MD Anderson. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6(l):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0346-6

15. Nagyivanyi K., Budai B., Biro K., et al. Synergistic survival: a new phenomenon connected to adverse events of first line sunitinib treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016;14(4):314-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2015.11.016

16. Maraz A., Cserhati A., Uhercsak G., et al. Therapeutic significance of sunitinib-induced ‘off-target’ side effects. Magy Onkol 2014;58(3):167—172

17. Silberg M., Krabbe L.-M., Martin Bogemann, et al. Immune-related adverse events can predict progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024;22(5):102164. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102164

18. Washino S., Shirotake S., Takeshita H., et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab: immortal time bias-corrected analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2023;28(12):1651-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0147-023-02406-x

19. Kobayashi K., Iikura Y., Hiraide M., et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and clinical outcome following nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In Vivo 2020;34(5):2647-2652. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12083

20. Verzoni E., Carteni G., Cortesi E., et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and association between immune-related adverse events and survival: the Italian expanded access program. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(l):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0579-z.


Review

For citations:


Volkova M.I., Nersesova T.A., Lyadova M.A., Kuzmina E.S., Antonova T.G., Tsareva E.V., Stativko O.A., Chernyaev V.A., Pokataev I.A. Impact of safety parameters and toxicity profile on the efficacy of first-line combination therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a real-world study. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(3):7-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-050

Views: 16


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-5057 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6813 (Online)