The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, or 40 years of walking in the evidence desert

   The study of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) began with pioneering works in the early 1980^s and has been ongoing for over 40 years. During this period, numerous randomized clinical trials have been conducted, many scrupulous meta-analyses have been performed, and clinical guidelines have been revised more than once. However, the results available at the moment can hardly be regarded as completely satisfying. After 40 years of walking in the desert of evidence-based medicine, we have no clear knowledge about the basic things: is there a place for NACT in the treatment of cervical cancer? If so, when and to whom should it be prescribed? What to do when the tumor response to chemotherapy is far from being satisfactory? The clinical application of NACT remains largely intuitive, based on extrapolation of available knowledge from other areas of oncology. The authors look at the future of NACT in the treatment of cervical cancer with cautious optimism, and invite the readers to recall the main points of the study of this method to help them understand where to go next.

1. Friedlander M.L., Atkinson K., Coppleson J.V., et al. The integration of chemotherapy into the management of locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1984;19(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90150-1

2. Sardi J.E., di Paola G.R., Cachau A., et al. A possible new trend in the management of the carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol 1986;25(2):139–149. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(86)90095-8

3. Panici P.B., Scambia G., Baiocchi G., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer. Prognostic factors for response and survival. Cancer 1991;67(2):372–379. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910115)67:2<372::aid-cncr2820670210>3.0.co;2-5

4. Benedetti-Panici P., Greggi S., Scambia G., et al. Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998;34(3):341–346. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10029-6

5. Piver M.S., Rutledge F., Smith J.P. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1974;44(2):265–272

6. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (NACCCMA) Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2004(2):CD001774. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001774.pub2

7. Benedetti-Panici P., Greggi S., Colombo A., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(1):179–188. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.179

8. Tierney J.F., Stewart L.A., Parmar M.K. Can the published data tell us about the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix? Eur J Cancer 1999;35(3):406–409. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00404-3

9. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(17):2470–2486. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00425-8

10. González-Martín A., González-Cortijo L., Carballo N., et al. The current role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110(3 Suppl 2):S36-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.012

11. Green J.A., Kirwan J.M., Tierney J.F., et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001;358(9284):781–786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05965-7

12. Peters W.A. 3rd, Liu P.Y., Barrett R.J. 2nd, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(8):1606–1613. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1606

13. Eddy G.L., Bundy B.N., Creasman W.T., et al. Treatment of (“bulky”) stage IB cervical cancer with or without neoadjuvant vincristine and cisplatin prior to radical hysterectomy and pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106(2):362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.007

14. Hou Q., Shen J., Zhou S., et al. Early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy helps decrease recurrence rate of cervical cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10(6):6092–6103. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2004

15. Kim H.S., Sardi J.E., Katsumata N., et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: an international collaborative meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39(2):115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.09.003

16. He L., Wu L., Su G., et al. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in different histological types of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014;134(2):419–425. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.001

17. Rydzewska L., Tierney J., Vale C.L., Symonds P.R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD007406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007406.pub2

18. Rydzewska L., Tierney J., Vale C.L., Symonds P.R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12(12):CD007406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007406.pub3

19. Kokka F., Bryant A., Brockbank E., et al. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2

20. Kokka F., Bryant A., Olaitan A., et al. Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;8(8):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3

21. Gupta S., Maheshwari A., Parab P., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(16):1548–1555. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985

22. Kenter G.G., Greggi S., Vergote I., et al. Randomized phase III study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus chemoradiation in stage IB2–IIB cervical cancer: EORTC-55994. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(32):5035–5043. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02852