Preview

Malignant tumours

Advanced search

Cachexia and its impact on early postoperative results in patients with resectable gastric cancer

https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-042

Abstract

   Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies which requires aggressive combined treatment with a high incidence of complications. The search for modifiable risk factors or predictors of complications’ development is ongoing.

   We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cachexia in patients with resectable GC.

   Materials and methods: A multi-center retro-prospective cohort study included data of 144 GC patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy between 2019 and 2023. Cachexia and sarcopenia were diagnosed according to the most recent consensus definitions. Сachexia was defined according to the international consensus criteria as the loss of ≥ 5 % of weight in 6 months or the loss of 2 % body weight in the presence of sarcopenia or BMI < 20 kg / m2. To assess the presence of sarcopenia we used Prado criteria (52.4 cm2 / m2 for men and 38.5 cm2 / m2 for women) and Martin criteria (41 cm2 / m2 for women and 43 cm2 / m2 for men with a BMI < 25 kg / m2 and 53 cm2 / mwith a BMI > 25 kg / m2) for L3 skeletal-muscle index. The 30-day incidence of postoperative complications and 90-day mortality were evaluated.

   Results: There were 57 (39.5 %) patients with cachexia. Cachexia was more prevalent in patients with TNM stage III (42.1 % vs 24.1 %, p = 0.023) and sarcopenic patients (measured by skeletal muscle mass, 49.1 % vs. 18.3 %, p < 0.001, as well as dynamometry, 14.3 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that cachexia was a significant predictor of postoperative complications (ОR = 2.208, 95 % CI 1.051–4.638, p = 0.036) and surgical site infection (OR = 3.916, 95 % CI 1.146–13.3874, p = 0.029). The 90-day mortality rate was higher among patients with cachexia (10.5 % vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.039).

   Conclusion: Preoperative cachexia is a potentially modifiable predictor of complications after gastric cancer surgery which may help to identify high-risk patients for proactive multimodal рrehabilitation.

About the Authors

V. K. Lyadov
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia; Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Vladimir Konstantinovich Lyadov

117152; 18A Zagorodnoe Shosse; 125993; Build. 1, 2 / 1 Barrikadnaya St.; Moscow; 654005; 5 Stroiteley Prospekt; Novokuznetsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



T. S. Boldyreva
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Tatyana Sergeevna Boldyreva

117152; 18A Zagorodnoe Shosse; Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



S. V. Gamayunov
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergei Viktorovich Gamayunov

603163; 11 / 1 Delovaya str.; 603950; 10 / 1 sq. Minina i Pozharskogo; Nizhnii Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



V. E. Zagainov
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Vladimir Evgenevich Zagainov

603163; 11 / 1 Delovaya str.; 603950; 10 / 1 sq. Minina i Pozharskogo; Nizhnii Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



N. M. Kiselev
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Nikolai Mikhailovich Kiselev

603163; 11 / 1 Delovaya str.; 603950; 10 / 1 sq. Minina i Pozharskogo; Nizhnii Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



S. A. Klimin
Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergei Andreevich Klimin

603163; 11 / 1 Delovaya str.; 603950; 10 / 1 sq. Minina i Pozharskogo; Nizhnii Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



V. N. Galkin
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Vsevolod Nikolaevich Galkin

117152; 18A Zagorodnoe Shosse; Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



References

1. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2023. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Medical Research Institute – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMIC of Radiology” Ministry of Health of Russia, 2024.262 p. (in Russ).

2. Pasquer A., Renaud F., Hec F., et al. Is Centralization Needed for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Patients With Low Operative Risk?: A Nationwide Study. AnnSurg 2016;264(5):823–30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001768

3. Jínek T., Adamčík L., Vrba R., et al. Risk factors and post-operative complications after gastrectomy for cancer. Rozhl Chir 2018;97(8):384–93

4. Sedakov I.E., Popovich A.Y., Zaika A.N., et al. Immediate results of gastrectomies in case of gastric cancer. Neoplasm 2019;11(2):72–75 (In Russ.). doi: 10.26435/neoplasm.v11i2.280

5. Wu C., Wang N., Zhou H., et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy toxicity and postoperative complications on short-term and long-term outcomes after curative resection of gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24(6):1278–89. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04257-2

6. Sadeghi M., Keshavarz-Fathi M., Baracos V., et al. Cancer cachexia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment. Critical Reviews Oncol/Hematol 2018;127:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.05.006

7. Fearon K., Strasser F., Anker S.D., et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12(5):489–95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7

8. Schiessel D.L., Vicente Cavagnari M.A., Mazur C.E., et al. The relationship between unintentional weight loss, grading system and overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Nutr Cancer 2022;74(5):1745–1753. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2021.1964545

9. Liu X., Xu P., Qiu H., et al. Preoperative nutritional deficiency is a useful predictor of postoperative outcome in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Transl Oncol 2016;9(6):482–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.09.008

10. Clinical Guidelines. Stomach cancer, 2020. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/574_1 (In Russ.)

11. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373–83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

12. Cruz-Jentoft A.J., Bahat G., Bauer J., et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48(1):16–31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169

13. Dodds R.M., Syddall H.E., Cooper R., et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One 2014;9(12):113–37. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637

14. Newman A.B., Simonsick E.M., Naydeck B.L., et al. Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA 2006;295(17):2018–26. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2018

15. Mourtzakis M., Prado C.M., Lieffers J.R., et al. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2008;33(5):997–1006. doi: 10.1139/H08-075

16. Martin L., Birdsell L., Macdonald N., et al. Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(12):1539–47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2722

17. Peixoto da Silva S., Santos J.M.O., Costa E Silva M.P., et al. Cancer cachexia and its pathophysiology: links with sarcopenia, anorexia and asthenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11(3):619–635. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12528

18. Cho M.R., Lee S., Song S.K. A Review of sarcopenia pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment and future direction. J Korean Med Sci 2022;37(18):146. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e146

19. Bowen T.S., Schuler G., Adams V. Skeletal muscle wasting in cachexia and sarcopenia: molecular pathophysiology and impact of exercise training. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015;6:197–207. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12043

20. Marzetti E., Lorenzi M., Landi F., et al. Altered mitochondrial quality control signaling in muscle of old gastric cancer patients with cachexia. Exp Gerontol 2017;87(Pt A):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.10.003

21. Dunne R.F., Crawford J., Smoyer K.E., et al. The mortality burden of cachexia or weight loss in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer : A systematic literature review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2024;15(5):1628–1640. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13510

22. Brown L.R., Sayers J., Yule M.S., et al. The prognostic impact of pre-treatment cachexia in resectional surgery for oesophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Br J Surg 2023;110(12):1703–11. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad239

23. Takaoka T., Yaegashi A., Watanabe D. Prevalence of and survival with cachexia among patients with cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr 2024;15(9):100282. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100282

24. Obukhova O.A., Bagrova S.G., Besova N.S., et al. Evaluation of nutritional status of patients with inoperable gastric cancer at the start of antitumor treatment. Preliminary results of a prospective observational study. The difficult patient 2018;16(6):6–11 (In Russ.)

25. Uvarov I.B., Asipovich O.M., Derbenev S.N., et al. Assessment of the nutritional status and skeletal muscle condition in patients with resectable gastric cancer. Innovative Medicine of Kuban 2024;9(1):69–77 (In Russ.). doi: 10.35401/2541-9897-2024-9-1-69-77

26. Dijksterhuis W.P.M., Latenstein A.E.J., van Kleef J.J., et al. Cachexia and dietetic interventions in patients with esophagogastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(2):144–52. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7615. PMID: 33418527

27. Mason M.C., Garcia J.M., Sansgiry S., et al. Preoperative cancer cachexia and short-term outcomes following surgery. J Surg Res 2016;205(2):398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.076

28. Minnella E.M., Awasthi R., Loiselle S.E., et al. Effect of exercise and nutrition prehabilitation on functional capacity in esophagogastric cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;153(12):1081–1089. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1645.


Review

For citations:


Lyadov V.K., Boldyreva T.S., Gamayunov S.V., Zagainov V.E., Kiselev N.M., Klimin S.A., Galkin V.N. Cachexia and its impact on early postoperative results in patients with resectable gastric cancer. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(2):16-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-042

Views: 166


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-5057 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6813 (Online)