Multiparametric ultrasound diagnosis of metastatic and lymphoproliferative changes in lymph nodes in primary-multiple malignant tumors, including breast cancer and lymphoma
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-4-37-44
Abstract
In this article, based on two clinical examples, the possibilities of multiparametric ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of metastatic and lymphoproliferative changes in lymph nodes in primary-multiple malignant tumors, including breast cancer and lym - phoma, are evaluated. Multiparameteric ultrasound includes B-mode, color and energy Doppler imaging, strain elastography, shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Standardization and reproducibility of these ultrasound techniques will allow to objectify the study, obtaining specific indicators of shear wave velocity in the zones of interest and specific signs of contrast enhancement, which can be used as impor tant differential diagnostic tool in oncology.
About the Authors
E. V. KovalevaRussian Federation
postgraduate student, Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
T. Yu. Danzanova
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Leading Researcher, Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
G. T. Sinyukova
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Professor, Head of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
P. I. Lepedatu
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
E. A. Gudilina
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
I. V. Kolyadina
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Professor, Department of Oncology
P. A. Zeynalova
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Professor, Head of the Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation
A. A. Semenova
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation
References
1. Chissov V. I., Starinsky V. V., Petrova G. V. Sostoyaniye onkologicheskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2010 godu (Status of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2010). Moscow: FSBI “P. A. Hercen MNRO” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2011. 188 p. (In Russ.).
2. Skoropad V. Iu., Berdov B. A., Rukhadze G. O., Evdokimov L. V. Polyneoplasias of three or more sites in patients with cancer of the stomach and large intestine. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P. A. Gertsena. 2012. No. 3. P. 16‑21. (In Russ.).
3. Vazhenin A. V., Bekhtereva Ye. I., Bekhtereva S. A., Gyulov Kh. Ya. Ocherki pervichnoy mnozhestvennosti zlokachestvennykh opukholey (Essays on the primary multiplicity of malignant tumors). Chelyabinsk: Iyeroglif, 2000. 213 p. (In Russ.).
4. Shunko E. L. Problem risk of developing primary multiple cancer following radiotherapy and chemotherapy first tumor in modern English literature. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. No. 6. P. 1210. (In Russ.).
5. Vazhenin A. V., Shanazarov N. A., Shunko E. L. Most often encountered combinations polyneoplasia after chemoradiotherapy. Palliative care and rehabilitation. 2016. No. 3. P. 35‑38. (In Russ.).
6. Jenkinson H. C., Hawkins M. M., Stiller C. A. Long-term population-based risks of second malignant neoplasms after childhood cancer in Britain. Br. J. Cancer. 2004. Vol. 91. P. 1905–1910.
7. Corso G., Veronesi P., Santomauro G. I., Maisonneuve P., Morigi C., Peruzzotti G. et al. Multiple primary non-breast tumors in breast cancer survivors. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018. Vol. 5. No. 144. P. 979–986.
8. Kolyadina I. V., Komov D. V., Poddubnaya I. V., Danzanova T. Yu., Kostyakova L. A., Sinyukova G. T., Banov S. M. Clinical semiotics and surgical preoperative diagnosis of stage-i breast cancer. Rossiyskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. No. 4. P. 17–20. (In Russ.).
9. Pavlikova O. A., Poddubnaya I. V., Kolyadina I. V., Abdullaev A., Komov D. V., Danzanova T. Yu., Sinyukova G. T., Kozlov N. A., Ganshina I. P., Zhukova L. G., Aliyeva G. S., Kerimov R. A., Gordeeva O. O. Clinical and radiological evaluation the effectiveness of preoperative systemic therapy in different biological subtypes of breast cancer stages T1-3N0-1M0. Sovremennaya onkologiya. 2017. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 16–21. (In Russ.).
10. Alymov Yu. V., Sholokhov V. N., Podvyaznikov S. O., Mudunov A. M., Berdnikov S. N. Up-to-date opportunities of cervical lymph nodes ultrasound investigation in patients, suffering from oral cavity cancer. Opukholi golovy i shei. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 33–38. (In Russ.).
11. Furukawa M. K., Kubota A., Hanamura H., Furukawa M. Clinical application of real-time tissue elastography to head and neck cancer – evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis with real-time tissue elastography. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2007. Vol. 110. No. 7. P. 503‑505 (In Japanese).
12. Xin-Wu C., Jenssen C., Saftoiu A., Ignee A., Dietrich C. F. New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013. Vol. 30. No. 19. P. 4850–4860.
13. Bhatia K. S., Cho C. C., Tong C. S., Yuen E. H., Ahuja A. T. Shear wave elasticity imaging of cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012. No. 38. P. 195–201.
14. Lo W. C., Cheng P. W., Wang C. T., Liao L. J. Real-time ultrasound elastography: an assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Eur. Radiol. 2013. No. 23. P. 2351–2357.
15. Teng D. K., Wang H., Lin Y. Q., Sui G. Q., Guo F., Sun L. N. Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012. No. 13. P. 2081–2085.
16. Zhang Y., Lv Q., Yin Y., Xie M., Xiang F., Lu C., Yan T., Li W., Xu H., Huang Y. The value of ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of superficial lymph nodes. Frontiers of Medicine in China. 2009. No. 3. P. 368–374.
17. Choi Y. J., Lee J. H., Baek J. H. Ultrasound elastography for evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasonography. 2015. No. 34. P. 157–164.
18. Piscaglia F., Nols e C., Dietrich C. F., Cosgrove D. O., Gilja O. H., Bachmann Nielsen M. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012. No. 33. P. 33–59.
19. Rubaltelli L., Beltrame V., Tregnaghi A., Scagliori E., Frigo A. C., Stramare R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing lymph nodes with focal cortical thickening in patients with cutaneous melanoma. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011. No. 196. P. 8–12.
20. Yu M., Liu Q., Song H. P., Han Z. H., Su H. L., He G. B., Zhou X. D. Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. No. 29. P. 735–740.
21. Ouyang Q., Chen L., Zhao H., Xu R., Lin Q. Detecting metastasis of lymph nodes and predicting aggressiveness in patients with breast carcinomas. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. No. 29. P. 343–352.
22. Yu M., Liu Q., Song H. P., Han Z. H., Su H. L., He G. B., Zhou X. D. Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy. J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. No. 29. P. 735–740.
23. Jin Y., Peng Y. L., Qiu L., Ma B. Y., Zhao H. N., Luo H. H., He Y. S., Yang P. The perfusion pattern of lymphadenopathy in contrastenhanced ultrasonograph. under different reference conditions. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 45. P. 1005–1009.
24. Nakase K., Yamamoto K., Hiasa A., Tawara I., Yamaguchi M., Shiku H. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of lymph nodes in different types of lymphoma. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006. No. 30. P. 188–191.
25. Fodor D., Pascu I., Pop S., Poanta L. The utility of elastography and CEUS for the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymphadenopaty. Three cases report. Med. Ultrason. 2013. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 63–66.
Review
For citations:
Kovaleva E.V., Danzanova T.Yu., Sinyukova G.T., Lepedatu P.I., Gudilina E.A., Kolyadina I.V., Zeynalova P.A., Semenova A.A. Multiparametric ultrasound diagnosis of metastatic and lymphoproliferative changes in lymph nodes in primary-multiple malignant tumors, including breast cancer and lymphoma. Malignant tumours. 2018;8(4):37-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-4-37-44