Surgical quality issues in ovarian cancer patients
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-1-31-37
Abstract
There is a major influence of residual tumor on long term survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Tumor can directly involve various organs of abdominal cavity. Complex surgical procedures and multiple resections may be necessary in order to achieve complete debulking. However, its rate remains low and sub-optimal debulking is common. Currently, quality of surgical treatment in ovarian cancer is an emerging medical problem. This article is dedicated to review of various approaches to improve quality of care in advanced ovarian cancer including recent local and international initiatives in this field.
About the Authors
A. A. Rumyantsev
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD student, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD student, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
I. A. Pokataev
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
A. S. Tjulandina
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD Med, Senior Researcher, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
S. A. Tjulandin
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, DSc Med, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
References
1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Ovarian Cancer, Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Version 1.2017.
2. Тюляндин С.А., Деньгина Н.В., Коломиец Л.А., Морхов К.Ю., Нечушкина В.М., Покатаев И.А. и др. Практические рекомендации по лекарственному лечению рака яичников/первичного рака брюшины/рака маточных труб // Злокачественные опухоли. 2016. №4. Спецвыпуск 2. С. 123–134. [Tjulandin S.A., Dengina N.V., Kolomiets L.A., Morkhov K.Yu., Nechushkina V.M., Pokataev I.A. et al. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po lekarstvennomu lecheniyu raka yaichnikov/pervichnogo raka bryushiny/raka matochnykh trub. Zlokachestvennye opukholi. 2016. No. 4. Special issue 2. P. 123–134 (In Russ.)].
3. Querleu D., Planchamp F., Chiva L., Fotopoulou C., Barton D., Cibula D. et al. European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology Quality Indicators for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2016. Vol. 26 (7). P. 1354–1363.
4. SGO Quality Indicators. Available from: https://www.sgo.org/quality-outcomes-and-research/quality-indicators/.
5. du Bois A., Reuss A., Pujade-Lauraine E., Harter P., Ray-Coquard I., Pfisterer J. Role of Surgical Outcome as Prognostic Factor in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of 3 Prospectively Randomized Phase 3 Multicenter Trials. Cancer. 2009. Vol. 115 (6). P. 1234–1244.
6. Eisenkop S.M., Friedman R. L., Wang H. J. Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 1998. Vol. 69 (2). P. 103–108.
7. Eisenkop S.M., Nalick R.H., Teng N.N. H: Modified posterior exenteration for ovarian cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991. Vol. 78. P. 879–885.
8. Winter W. E. 3rd, Maxell G. L., Tian C., Carlson J.W., Ozols R. F., Rose P.G. et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007. Vol. 25 (24). P. 3621–3627.
9. Peiretti M., Zanagnolo V., Aletti G.D., Bocciolone L., Colombo N., Landoni F. et al. Role of maximal primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian and tubalcancer: Surgical and oncological outcomes. Single institution experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010. Vol. 119 (2). P. 259–264.
10. Harter P., Muallem Z.M., Buhrmann C., Lorenz D., Kaub C., Hils R. et al. Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011. Vol. 121 (3). P. 615–619.
11. Chi D. S., Musa F., Dao F., Zivanovic O., Sonoda Y., Leitao M. M. et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol. Oncol. 2012. Vol. 124 (1). P. 10–14.
12. Tanner E. J., Long K.C., Feffer J.B., Leitao M.M. Jr, Abu-Rustum N.R., Barakat R.R. et al. Parenchymal splenic metastasis is an independent negative predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 128 (1). P. 28–33.
13. Stuart G.C., Kitchener H., Bacon M., du Bois A., Friedlander M. et al. 2010 Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus statement on clinical trials in ovarian cancer: report from the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2011. Vol. 21 (4). P. 750–755.
14. Landrum L.M., Java J., Mathews C.A., Lanneau G.S. Jr, Copeland L. J., Armstrong D.K. et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 130 (1). P. 12–18.
15. Oza A.M., Cook A.D., Pfisterer J., Embleton A., Ledermann J.A., Pujade-Lauraine E. Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (ICON7): overall survival results of a phase 3 randomized trial // Lancet Oncol. 2015. Vol. 16 (8). P. 928–936.
16. Trimbos J.B., Vergote I., Bolis G., Vermorken J.B., Mangioni C. et al. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003. Vol. 95 (2). P. 113–125.
17. Elit L., Bondy S., Chen Z., Law C., Paszat L. The quality of the operative report for women with ovarian cancer in Ontario. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2006. Vol. 28 (10). P. 892-897.
18. Gogoi R.P., Urban R., Sun H., Goff B. Evaluation of Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) ovarian cancer quality surgical measures. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012. Vol. 126 (2). P. 217–219.
19. https://www.esgo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Ovarian-cancer-surgery-Guidelines-advanced-stages.pdf.
20. https://www.sgo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/DCF-8-25-14-Ovarian_Operative_Care_Postop_complications.pdf.
21. http://www.iccr-cancer.org/datasets/published-datasets/female-reproductive-organs/carcinoma-of-the-ovary-fallopian-tube-primary-peri.
22. Verleye L., Ottevanger P.B., Kristensen G.B., Ehlen T., Johnson N. et al. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial. Eur. J. Cancer. 2011. Vol. 47 (1). P. 57–64.
23. http://www.abog.org/publications/Program%20Requirements-GO-Sept%202014.pdf.
24. http://www.abog.org/publications/Guide%20to%20Learning-GO.pdf.
25. Cibula D., Verheijen R., Lopes A., Amant F., Beller U., Colombo N. et al. Training in bowel and upper abdominal surgery in gynaecological oncology: European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) Statement. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2011. Vol. 21 (7). P. 1264–1265.
26. ESGO Training in Gynaecological Oncology. Curriculum and Log Book. Available from: https://www.esgo.org/individual-accreditation/.
27. Приказ Минздрава России от 10.05.2017 N 203н «Об утверждении критериев оценки качества медицинской помощи» (Зарегистрировано в Минюсте России 17.05.2017 N 46740). https://rg.ru/2017/05/18/minzdrav-prikaz203-site-dok.html. [Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia from 10.05.2017 N 203n “On the approval of criteria for quality assessment in healthcare” (Registered in the Ministry of Justice of Russia on 05/17/2017 N 46740) (In Russ.)].
28. Tewari K.S., Java J. J., Eskander R.N., Monk B. J., Burger R.A. Early initiation of chemotherapy following complete resection of advanced ovarian cancer associated with improved survival: NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Ann. Oncol. 2016. Vol. 27 (1). P. 114–121.
29. NHS Scotland. Ovarian Cancer Clinical Quality Performance Indicators. Published: August 2013. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/cancer_care_improvement/cancer_qpis/quality_performance_indicators.aspx.
30. Royal College of Pathologists (2010) Datasets for the histopathological reporting of neoplasms of the ovaries and fallopian tubes and primary carcinomas of the peritoneum (3rd edition) [Accessed on 22 July 2017]. https://www.rcpath.org/asset/1CA4BD30-1035-42B3-AB92D0AD8DDD5335/.
Review
For citations:
Rumyantsev A.A., Pokataev I.A., Tjulandina A.S., Tjulandin S.A. Surgical quality issues in ovarian cancer patients. Malignant tumours. 2018;8(1):31-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-1-31-37
Views:
1991
Email this article 