Treatment of patients with poor risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at advanced stages
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2017-3-23-29
Abstract
Modern chemotherapy followed by surgery can cure the majority of patients with advanced nonseminomatous germ cell tumors but only half of patients with poor risk according IGCCCG classification. The most challenge is to treat frail patients with highly extensive disease. First cycle of induction chemotherapy associates with high complication rate (severe infections, cytopenia, tumor-lysis syndrome, bleedings, respiratory insufficiency) and mortality. Using of low-dose first cycle (2–3 days of EP regimen) instead of full-dose one can improve poor patient»s status, prevent severe toxicity, allow to start next cycle earlier and does not diminish long-term outcome.
About the Authors
A. A. TryakinRussian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Chemotherapy and Combined Modalities Treatment
M. U. Fedyanin
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Chemotherapy and Clinical Pharmacology
A. A. Bulanov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Chemotherapy and Clinical Pharmacology
V. B. Matveev
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Oncourology
J. S. Sergeev
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Oncology, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
I. A. Fainstein
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Radiosurgery
Sh. R. Kashia
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Head of Intensive Care Unit No. 5
I. A. Kurmukov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Leading Researcher of Intensive Care Unit No. 5
T. U. Zakharova
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Pathology Department
S. A. Tjulandin
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Chemotherapy and Clinical Pharmacology
References
1. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers, J. Clin. Oncol., 1997, Vol. 15, pp. 594–603.
2. Tryakin A., Tjulandin S., Titov D. et al. C-BOP-3BEP as induction chemotherapy (CT) in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) patients with poor prognosis, J. Clin. Oncol., ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2004, Vol. 22 (14S), 486P (abstr.).
3. Tryakin A., Fedyanin M., Kanagavel D. et al. Paclitaxel + BEP (T-BEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: a phase II study, Urology, 2011, Vol. 78 (3), pp. 620–625.
4. Tryakin A., Fedyanin M., Sergeev U. et al. Two-weekly accelerated BEP (aBEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy in intermediate and poor prognosis patients (pts) with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): Efficacy results of phase II trial, J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, Vol. 33 (suppl.; abstr. e15566).
5. Logothetis C. J., Choriocarcinoma syndrome, Cancer Bull., 1984, Vol. 36, pp. 118–120.
6. Moran-Ribon A., Droz J. P., Leclercq B. et al. Super-high risk germ-cell tumors: a clinical entity. Report of eleven cases, Support Care Cancer, 1994, Vol. 2, pp. 253–258.
7. Massard C., Plantade A., Gross-Goupil M. et al. Poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCTs): should chemotherapy doses be reduced at first cycle to prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with multiple lung metastases? Ann. Oncol., 2010, Vol. 21 (8), pp. 1585–1588.
8. Huddart R. A., Gabe R., Cafferty F. H. et al. A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (CBOP / BEP) and Standard BEP in Poor-prognosis Germ Cell Tumours (MRC TE23, CRUK 05 / 014, ISRCTN 53643604), Eur. Urol., 2015, Vol. 67, pp. 534–543.
Review
For citations:
Tryakin A.A., Fedyanin M.U., Bulanov A.A., Matveev V.B., Sergeev J.S., Fainstein I.A., Kashia Sh.R., Kurmukov I.A., Zakharova T.U., Tjulandin S.A. Treatment of patients with poor risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors at advanced stages. Malignant tumours. 2017;(3):23-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2017-3-23-29