Controversies in surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2017-3-13-22
Abstract
Approximately 70–80% patients with ovarian cancer are diagnosed at advanced stages. Surgical debulking followed by platinum based chemotherapy is a standard frontline treatment for this disease. There is another approach consisted of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by a debulking surgery which is on rise. In this article we reviewed the current evidence which highlights the importance of radical surgery aimed to achieve complete or optimal debulking in ovarian cancer patients. We analyzed the results of large randomized clinical trials addressed the issue of efficacy of primary and interval debulking surgery and compared their results to the data about treatment outcomes in leading cancer centers. We drew conclusions about the current role of interval debulking surgery and discussed the ways to improve patient outcomes.
About the Authors
A. A. Rumyantsev
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, student, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, student, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
A. S. Tjulandina
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: atjulandina@gmail.com
Competing Interests: MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: atjulandina@gmail.com
Competing Interests: MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
I. A. Pokataev
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
S. A. Tjulandin
N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
References
1. Каприн А. Д., Старинский В. В., Петрова Г. В. Злокачественные заболевания в России в 2014 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М., 2016. 250 с. [Kaprin A. D., Starinskii V. V., Petrova G. V. Zlokachestvennye zabolevaniya v Rossii v 2014 godu (zabolevaemost’i smertnost’), Moscow, 2016, 250 p. (In Russ.)].
2. Howlader N., Noone A. M., Krapcho M. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012, based on November 2014 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2015.
3. Griffiths C. T. Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr., 1975, Vol. 42, pp. 101–104.
4. Hoskins W. J. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma: principles of primary surgery. Gynecol. Oncol., 1994, Vol. 55 (3 Pt. 2), pp. S91–S96.
5. Elattar A., Bryant A., Winter-Roach B. A., Hatem M., Naik R. Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2011, Issue 8, Art. No. CD007565.
6. Winter W. E. 3rd, Maxell G. L., Tian C., Carlson J. W., Ozols R. F., Rose P. G. et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study, J. Clin. Oncol., 2007, Vol. 25 (24), pp. 3621–3627.
7. du Bois A., Reuss A., Pujade-Lauraine E., Harter P., Ray-Coquard I., Pfisterer J. Role of Surgical Outcome as Prognostic Factor in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of 3 Prospectively Randomized Phase 3 Multicenter Trials, Cancer, 2009, Vol. 115 (6), pp. 1234–1244.
8. Crawford S. C., Vasey P. A., Paul J., Hay A., Davis J. A., Kaye S. B. Does Aggressive Surgery Only Benefit Patients With Less Advanced Ovarian Cancer? Results From an International Comparison Within the SCOTROC-1 Trial, J. Clin. Oncol., 2005, Vol. 34,
9. pp. 8802–8811.
10. Horowitz N. S., Miller A., Rungruang B., Richard S. D., Rodriguez N., Bookman M. A. et al. Does Aggressive Surgery Improve Outcomes? Interaction Between Preoperative Disease Burden and Complex Surgery in Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: An Analysis of GOG 182, J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, Vol. 8, pp. 937–943.
11. Bookman M. A., Brady M. F., McGuire W. P., Harper P. G., Alberts D. S., Friedlander M. et al. Evaluation of New Platinum-Based Treatment Regimens in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup, J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, Vol. 9, pp. 1419–1425.
12. Chi D. S., Eisenhauer E. L., Zivanovic O., Sonoda Y., Abu-Rustum N. R., Levine D. A. et al. Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm, Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, Vol. 114 (1), pp. 26–31.
13. Harter P., Muallem Z. M., Buhrmann C., Lorenz D., Kaub C., Hils R. et al. Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer, Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, Vol. 121 (3), pp. 615–619.
14. Vergote I., Trope C. G, Amant F., Kristensen G. B., Ehlen T., Johnson N. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, Vol. 363, pp. 943–953.
15. Vergote I., Trope C. G., Amant F., Kristensen G. B., Ehlen T., Johnson N. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, Vol. 363, pp. 943–953, Supplementary appendix.
16. Kehoe S., Hook J., Nankivell M., Jayson G. C., Kitchener H., Lopes T. et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, Lancet, 2015, Vol. 386, pp. 249–257.
17. Kehoe S., Hook J., Nankivell M., Jayson G. C., Kitchener H., Lopes T. et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, Lancet, 2015, Vol. 386, pp. 249–257, Supplementary appendix.
18. Chi D. S., Musa F., Dao F., Zivanovic O., Sonoda Y., Leitao M. M. et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, Vol. 124 (1), pp. 10–14.
19. Tanner E.J., Long K.C., Feffer J.B., Leitao M.M. Jr, Abu-Rustum N.R., Barakat R.R. et al. Parenchymal splenic metastasis is an independent negative predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer, Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, Vol. 128 (1), pp. 28–33.
20. Harter P., Muallem Z. M., Buhrmann C., Lorenz D., Kaub C., Hils R. et al. Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer, Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, Vol. 121 (3), pp. 615–619.
21. Pairetti M., Zanagnolo V., Aletti G. D., Bocciolone L., Colombo N., Landoni F. et al. Role of maximal primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian and tubalcancer: Surgical and oncological outcomes. Single institution experience, Gynecol. Oncol., 2010, Vol. 119 (2), pp. 259–264.
22. Oza A. M., Cook A. D., Pfisterer J., Embleton A., Ledermann J. A., Pujade-Lauraine E. et al. Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (ICON7): overall survival results of a phase 3 randomised trial, Lancet Oncol., 2015, Vol. 16 (8), pp. 928–936.
23. van der Burg M. E., van Lent M., Buyse M., Kobierska A., Colombo N., Favall G. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 1995, Vol. 332 (10), pp. 629–634.
24. Onda T., Satoh T., Saito T., Kasamatsu T., Nakanishi T., Nakamura K. et al. Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III / IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602, Eur. J. Cancer, 2016, Vol. 64, pp. 22–31.
25. Luo Y., Lee M., Kim H. S., Chung H. H., Song Y. S. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on platinum resistance in stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, Vol. 95 (36), e4797.
26. Rauh-Hain J. A., Nitschmann C. C., Worley M. J. Jr, Bradford L. S., Berkowitz R. S., Schorge J. O. et al. Platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to primary surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma, Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, Vol. 129 (1), pp. 63–68.
27. Melamed A., Hinchcliff E. M., Clemmer J. T., Bregar A. J., Uppal S., Bostock I. et al. Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States, Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, Vol. 143 (2), pp. 236–240.
28. Meyer L. A., Sronin A. M., Sun C. C., Bixel K., Bookman M. A., Cristea M. C. et al. Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer, J. Clin. Oncol., 2016, Vol. 32, pp. 3854–3863.
29. Narod S., Sopik V. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Are the ASCO and SGO recommendations warranted? Gynecol. Oncol., 2017, Vol. 144 (2), pp. 238–240.
30. Armstrong D. K., Bundy B., Wenzel L., Huang H. Q., Baergen R., Lele S. et al. Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, Vol. 354, pp. 34–43.
31. Landrum L. M., Java J., Mathews C. A., Lanneau G. S. Jr, Copeland L. J., Armstrong D. K. et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study, Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, Vol. 130 (1), pp. 12–18.
32. Mueller J. J., Kelly A., Zhou Q., Iasonos A., Long Roche K., Sonoda Y. et al. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center, Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, Sep 28 [Epub ahead of print].
Review
For citations:
Rumyantsev A.A., Tjulandina A.S., Pokataev I.A., Tjulandin S.A. Controversies in surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Malignant tumours. 2017;(3):13-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2017-3-13-22
Views:
1175
Email this article 