Using artificial intelligence tools to predict recurrence risk in pancreatic cancer. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-064
Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies (2019–2024) evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for predicting pancreatic cancer (PCa) recurrence was conducted. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.58–0.95] and 0.79 [95 % CI: 0.57–1.00], respectively. Key limitations of the study included high heterogeneity (I² > 98 %), which could be related to the small number of included studies and insufficient standardization of the validation methods.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools provide new possibilities in predicting the course of pancreatic cancer.
Purpose: To conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms (sensitivity and specificity) for predicting PCa recurrence and to compare the effectiveness of different types of algorithms. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in leading scientific databases, covering publications from 2019 to 2024. The review included studies that applied artificial intelligence tools to predict the risk of pancreatic cancer recurrence. The data search and analysis were conducted in three stages: a primary search of studies using keywords and inclusion criteria; screening of the titles and abstracts to select relevant studies; and a detailed assessment of the full texts of the selected articles.
The data synthesis included an analysis of the performance of the AI models, the types of data used (clinical, genomic, radiological, etc.), and the validation and testing strategies for the proposed algorithms.
A random-effects model was used for the sensitivity and specificity meta-analysis, with the calculation of pooled estimates, 95 % confidence intervals, and heterogeneity indices (I², τ²). A meta-regression was also performed to assess the impact of the algorithm type on sensitivity. Statistical analysis was carried out in R (metafor package) with forest plot visualization.
Results: This systematic review included 10 studies, of which 5 were selected for the meta-analysis. The results demonstrate a pooled sensitivity of 0.77 [95 % CI: 0.58–0.95] and specificity of 0.79 [95 % CI: 0.57–1.00] for AI algorithms in predicting PCa recurrence. In the analysis of individual algorithm types, artificial neural networks (ANNs) showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 [0.73–1.01], while support vector machines (SVMs) had a negative impact on sensitivity (coefficient –0.45 [–0.69 to –0.21]). The meta-analysis revealed high heterogeneity of the studies (I² = 98.84 % for sensitivity and I² = 99.42 % for specificity), requiring cautious interpretation of the results.
Conclusion: AI models are promising tools for predicting pancreatic cancer recurrence, but require data standardization and prospective validation in clinical practice.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. Sh. ManukyanRussian Federation
Manukyan Mariam Shirakovna
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
V. I. Pavlova
Russian Federation
Pavlova Valeria Igorevna
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
32 Barnaulskay St., Tyumen 625041
54 Odesskaya St., Tyumen 625023
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
R. Sh. Abdulaeva
Russian Federation
Abdulaeva Rukiyat Shamilievna
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
T. G. Gevorkyan
Russian Federation
Gevorkyan Tigran Gagikovich
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
S. S. Gordeev
Russian Federation
Gordeev Sergey Sergeevich
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
54 Odesskaya St., Tyumen 625023
Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
References
1. SEER Cancer Statistics: Pancreas. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html
2. Leonhardt C.S., Gustorff C., Klaiber U., et al. Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2024;167(5):977–992. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.028
3. Song W., Miao D.L., Chen L. Nomogram for predicting survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2018;11:539–545. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S154599
4. Goldstein D, Von Hoff D.D., Chiorean E.G., et al. Nomogram for estimating overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2020;49(6):744–750. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001563
5. Tran K.A., Kondrashova O., Bradley A., et al., Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. Genome Med 2021;13(1):152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00968-x
6. Palumbo D., Mori M., Prato F., et al. Prediction of early distant recurrence in upfront resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multidisciplinary, machine learning-based approach. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(19):4938. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194938
7. Lee, K.S., et al. Usefulness of artificial intelligence for predicting recurrence following surgery for pancreatic cancer: Retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg, 2021.93:p.106050.
8. Hayward, J., Alvarez S.A., Ruiz C., et al., Machine learning of clinical performance in a pancreatic cancer database. Artif Intell Med 2010;49(3):187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2010.04.009
9. Walczak S., Velanovich V. An evaluation of artificial neural networks in predicting pancreatic cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21(10):1606–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3518-7
10. Sala Elarre P., Oyaga-Iriarte E., Yu K.H., et al., Use of Machine-Learning Algorithms in Intensified Preoperative Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer to Predict Individual Risk of Relapse. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11(5):606. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050606
11. Tong Z., Liu Y., Ma H., et al. Development, validation and comparison of artificial neural network models and logistic regression models predicting survival of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00196
12. Baig Z., Abu-Omar N., Khan R., et al. Prognosticating outcome in pancreatic head cancer with the use of a machine learning algorithm. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021;20:15330338211050767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033821105 0767
13. Hsu T.H., Schawkat K., Berkowitz S.J., et al., Artificial intelligence to assess body composition on routine abdominal CT scans and predict mortality in pancreatic cancer- A recipe for your local application. Eur J Radiol 2021;142:109834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109834
14. Chen, Q., Hu Y., Lin W., et al. Studying the impact of marital status on diagnosis and survival prediction in pancreatic ductal carcinoma using machine learning methods. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):5273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-02453145-6
15. Pasha S.A., Khalid A., Levy T., et al. Machine learning to predict completion of treatment for pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2024;130(8):1605–1610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27812
16. Nopour R. Establishment of prediction model for mortality risk of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024;24(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02590-4
Review
For citations:
Manukyan M.Sh., Pavlova V.I., Abdulaeva R.Sh., Gevorkyan T.G., Gordeev S.S. Using artificial intelligence tools to predict recurrence risk in pancreatic cancer. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(4):56–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-064
JATS XML




























