Efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world clinical practice data
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-063
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy in real-world clinical practice in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer.
Objectives: To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) by olaparib therapy line. To determine the predictive value of the level of the cancer marker CA-125 before therapy. To analyze the incidence of adverse events requiring dose reduction or drug discontinuation.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis included data of 110 patients with Stage I–IV BRCA1 / 2 mutated high-grade serous ovarian cancer, who received olaparib maintenance therapy at the St. Petersburg Municipal Clinical Oncology Dispensary from 2020 to 2024. Patients were stratified into three groups: first-line olaparib (1L, n = 64), olaparib after the first recurrence (AR1, n = 24), and olaparib after two or more recurrences (AR2+ , n = 22). Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariate analysis using Cox regression.
Results: The median PFS was not reached in the 1L group. In the AR1 and AR2+ groups, the median PFS was 49 and 20 months, respectively (p < 0.001). An elevated baseline CA-125 level (> 35 U / mL) before initiation of olaparib therapy was associated with a statistically significant 3.2-fold increase in the risk of progression (odds ratio [OR] 3.2; 95 % CI 1.5–6.8; p = 0.003). Toxicities requiring dose adjustment were reported in 14.1 %, 12.5 %, and 13.6 % of patients in the 1L, AR1, and AR2+ groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Olaparib maintenance therapy demonstrated high clinical efficacy and a manageable safety profile in real-world settings, with the greatest benefit observed in the first-line setting. Elevated pre-treatment CA-125 levels (> 35 U / mL) are an unfavorable prognostic marker.
Keywords
About the Authors
R. V. OrlovaRussian Federation
Orlova Rashida Vakhidovna
7–9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
A. V. Androsova
Russian Federation
Androsova Aleksandra Valerevna
7–9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
E. E. Topuzov
Russian Federation
Topuzov Eldar Eskenderovich
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
I. V. Avramenko
Russian Federation
Avramenko Inna Vladimirovna
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
N. P. Belyak
Russian Federation
Belyak Natalya Petrovna
7–9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
S. I. Kutukova
Russian Federation
Kutukova Svetlana Igorevna
6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
K. I. Muratova
Russian Federation
Muratova Ksenia Igorevna
6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
A. A. Korkina
Russian Federation
Korkina Alisa Andreevna
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
A. А. Varankina
Russian Federation
Varankina Anna Alekseevna
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
A. E. Alborov
Russian Federation
56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
R. V. Orlova has been a member of the editorial board of the journal “Malignant Tumors” since 2019 but had no role in the decision to publish this article. The article has undergone the journal’s established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest.
References
1. Webb P.M., Jordan S.J. Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017;41:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.006
2. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022.252 p (In Russ.)
3. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58(2):71–96. https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2007.0010
4. Nag S., Aggarwal S., Rauthan A., Warrier N. Maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer- a review. J Ovarian Res 2022;15(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01020-1
5. Tyulandina A.S., Kolomiets L.A., Morkhov K.Yu., et al. Practical recommendations for drug treatment of ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer. Malignant tumors: Practical recommendations RUSSCO 2022;3s2(12):198–211 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-198-211
6. Instructions for medical use of Lynparza® (film-coated tablets, 100, 150 mg). Registration certificate LP-005941 dated November 26, 2019, with amendment 1 dated April 4, 2023
7. Pellegrino B., Mateo J., Serra V., Balmaña J. Controversies in oncology: are genomic tests quantifying homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) useful for treatment decision making? ESMO Open 2019;4(2):e000480. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000480
8. Ray-Coquard I., Leary A., Pignata S., et al. Final overall survival results from the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial evaluating maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer [presentation. Presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO); September 9–13, 2022; Paris, France.
9. Ray-Coquard I., Pautier P., Pignata S., et al. Olaparib plus bevacizumab as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2416–2428. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911361
10. Vergote I., Gonzalez-Martin A., Ray-Coquard I., et al. European experts consensus: BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency testing in first-line ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2022;33(3):276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.013
11. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Ovarian Cancer Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Version 1. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Orlova R.V., Androsova A.V., Topuzov E.E., Avramenko I.V., Belyak N.P., Kutukova S.I., Muratova K.I., Korkina A.A., Varankina A.А., Alborov A.E. Efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world clinical practice data. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(4):26–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-063
JATS XML




























