Trends and outcomes of bladder cancer treatment over the past decade
https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-035
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is effectively used for urothelial bladder cancer, however, the risk of recurrence remains high necessitating the search for the new treatment approaches. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of pre- and postoperative treatments on 10-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer (BC).
Materials and methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included the surgical treatment outcomes of 484 patients with confirmed BC diagnosis (cTis-4N0–3) who underwent cystectomy between 2012 and 2021. The final analysis included 455 cases, with a median age of 65 years, and the majority being male (82.6 %). Prior radiation therapy (RT) was administered to 6.4 % of patients, BCG therapy to 5.9 %, and neoadjuvant therapy (NT) to 23.5 %. Among postoperative treatments, only adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) in 49 patients (10.8 %) was considered. The study protocol was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee (No. 32 / 355, dated December 23, 2020).
Results: Three key trends were identified over the past 10 years. First, the number of NT prescriptions increased by more than 50 %, mainly due to platinum-based regimens and immuno-oncological agents; however, such regimens were rarely used in patients over 75 years old. Second, prior definitive RT was found to be a significant risk factor for recurrence (OR 2.84, p < 0.001), while NT and AT did not impact survival due to the limited number of cases. Third, surgical treatment after RT was not limited to laparoscopic access and did not lead to an increase in positive surgical margins (detected in only one case, 3.4 %).
Conclusions: Our study revealed that definitive radiation therapy negatively affects oncological outcomes and increases the risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy, emphasizing the need for a cautious approach when selecting treatment for such patients.
About the Authors
M. V. BerkutRussian Federation
Berkut Mariya Vladimirovna
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
A. M. Belyaev
Russian Federation
Belyaev Aleksei Mikhailovich
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
A. K. Nosov
Russian Federation
Nosov Aleksandr Konstantinovich
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758
7–9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
References
1. Clinical Guidelines. Bladder cancer, Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/11_3 (In Russ.)
2. Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(3):666–675. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666
3. Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G., Sergeev A.V. et.al. Survival of patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Cancer Urology 2016;12(1):29–35 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-1-29-35
4. Perepetchay V.A., Vasilyev O.N., Spitsin I.M., Kogan M.I. The accuracy analysis of the factors influencing survival prediction after radical cystectomy. Experimental and clinical urology 2016;1:28–34 (In Russ.)
5. Shariat S.F., Karakiewicz P.I., Palapattu G.S., et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. Journal Urol 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2414–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.004
6. Yafi F.A., Aprikian A.G., Chin J.L., et al. Contemporary outcomes of 2287 patients with bladder cancer who were treated with radical cystectomy: a Canadian multicentre experience. BJU Int 2011;108(4):539–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09912.x
7. David K.A., Milowsky M.I., Ritchey J., et al. Low incidence of perioperative chemotherapy for stage III bladder cancer 1998 to 2003: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Urol 2007;178(2):451–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.101
8. Porter M.P., Kerrigan M.C., Donato B.M., Ramsey S.D. Patterns of use of systemic chemotherapy for Medicare beneficiaries with urothelial bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2011;29(3):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.021
9. Hamid A.R.A.H., Ridwan F.R., Parikesit D., et al. Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to radical cystectomy alone in improving overall survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. BMC Urol 2020;20(1):158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00733-z
10. Vetterlein M.W., Wankowicz S.A.M., Seisen T., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with variant histology. Cancer 2017;123(22):4346–4355. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30907
11. Basile G., Bandini M., Montorsi F., et al. Reply to Chao Quan, Jinbo Chen, and Jiao Hu’s letter to the editor re: Giuseppe Basile, Marco Bandini, Ewan A. Gibb, et al. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: 3-year median follow-up update of PURE-01 trial. Clin Cancer Res 2022;28:5107–14. Eur Urol 2023;83(4):e111-e112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.014
12. Szabados B., Kockx M., Assaf Z.J., et al. Final results of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer of the bladder. Eur Urol 2022;82(2):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.013
13. Rose T.L., Harrison M.R., Deal A.M., et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin plus pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(28):3140–3148. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01003
14. Huncharek M., Muscat J., Geschwind J.F. Planned preoperative radiation therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer; results of a meta-analysis. Anticancer Res 1998;18(3B):1931–1934.
15. Matveyev V.B., Volkova M.I., Figurin K.M., Peters M.V. Sparing cystectomy in patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Cancer Urology 2009;5(1):27–31 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2009-5-1-27-31
16. Volkova M.I., Tkhakokhov M.M., Chernyaev V.A., et al. alvage cystectomy after organ preservation treatment in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Urology 2016;12(4):131–141 (In Russ.)
17. Беркут М.В., Носов А.К. Десятилетний опыт радикальной цистэктомии в одном центре: ретроспективный анализ и онкологические результаты. Онкоурология 2024;20(4):[принято в печать DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-4-00-00
18. Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today
19. Lotan Y., Kamat A.M., Porter M.P., et al. Key concerns about the current state of bladder cancer: a position paper from the Bladder Cancer Think Tank, the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, and the Society of Urologic Oncology. Cancer 2009;115(18):4096–4103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24463
20. Berkut M.V., Artemyeva A.S., Khokhlova A.V., et al. The role of immunohistochemical analysis in determining the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer. Advances in Molecular Oncology 2024;11(4):102–113 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2024-11-4-102-113
21. Berkut M.V., Imyanitov E.N., Tiurin V.I., et al. Clinical evaluation of the significance of FGFR2/3 genomic alterations in urothelial cancer: a retrospective analysis. Voprosy Onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2024;70(4):685–695. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-4-685-695
22. Scher H.I., Yagoda A., Herr H.W., et al. Neoadjuvant M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) effect on the primary bladder lesion. J Urol 1988;139(3):470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42495-5
23. Narain T.A., Tosh J.M., Gautam G., et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for cisplatin ineligible muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: a review of available evidence. Urology 2021;154:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.010
24. Hussain S.A., Palmer D.H., Lloyd B., et al. A study of split-dose cisplatin-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Oncol Lett 2012;3(4):855–859. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.563
25. Nieuwenhuijzen J.A., Horenblas S., Meinhardt W., et al. Salvage cystectomy after failure of interstitial radiotherapy and external beam radiotherapy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 2004;94(6):793–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05034.x
26. Pieretti A., Krasnow R., Drumm M., et al. Complications and outcomes of salvage cystectomy after trimodality therapy. J Urol 2021;206(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001696
27. Schuettfort V.M., Pradere B., Quhal F., et al. Incidence and outcome of salvage cystectomy after bladder sparing therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2021;39(6):1757–1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03436-0.
Review
For citations:
Berkut M.V., Belyaev A.M., Nosov A.K. Trends and outcomes of bladder cancer treatment over the past decade. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(1):55–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2025-035