NGS as an auxiliary tool for differential diagnosis of solid tumors: a clinical case and literature review

Molecular genetic profiling of solid tumors by next generation sequencing (NGS) is widely used to select targeted therapy. At the same time, with rare exceptions, NGS has not proven to be a reliable tool for differential diagnosis of diseases. However, some types of tumors have specific somatic mutations, and their detection can serve as a reason for clarifying the diagnosis using standard methods. An example of such mutations are specific abnormalities in the EGFR gene, which occur exclusively in lung cancer. In the described clinical case, the patient was diagnosed with skin adenocarcinoma. Molecular genetic profiling revealed an EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation, which served as a reason for additional histological studies and revision of the diagnosis in favor of lung adenocarcinoma, and demonstrates the possibility of using the results of molecular profiling as an auxiliary method for differentiating cancer subtypes.

1. Imyanitov E., Sokolenko A. Integrative genomic tests in clinical oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(21):13129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113129

2. Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P., et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23(8):1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

3. Berek J.S., Matias-Guiu X., Creutzberg C., et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. Intl J Gynaecol Obstet 2023;162(2):383–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14923

4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Occult Primary (Cancer of Unknown Primary CUP) (Version 2.2025). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/occult.pdf

5. Novik A.V., Gladkov O.A., Imyanitov E.N., et al. Practical recommendations for drug treatment of tumors of unknown primary localization. Zlokachestvennie opuholi = Malignant Tumors 2022;12(3s2):353–365 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-353-365

6. Sharma S.V., Bell D.W., Settleman J., Haber D.A. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7(3):169–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2088

7. Tate J.G., Bamford S., Jubb H.C., et al. COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;47(D1):D941-D947. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1015

8. Krawczyk P., Jassem J., Wojas-Krawczyk K., et al. New genetic technologies in diagnosis and treatment of cancer of unknown primary. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(14):3429. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14143429

9. Pugh T.J., Bell J.L., Bruce J.P., et al. AACR project GENIE: 100,000 cases and beyond. Cancer Discov 2022;12(9):2044–2057. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1547

10. Lee J.C., Vivanco I., Beroukhim R., et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in glioblastoma through novel missense mutations in the extracellular domain. PLoS Med 2006;3(12):e485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030485

11. Zhao W., Song A., Xu Y., et al. Rare mutation-dominant compound EGFR-positive NSCLC is associated with enriched kinase domain-resided variants of uncertain significance and poor clinical outcomes. BMC Med 2023;21(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02768-z

12. Montagut C., Dalmases A., Bellosillo B., et al. Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer. Nat Med 2012;18(2):221–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2609

13. Wu S.G., Gow C.H., Yu C.J., et al. Frequent epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma. Eur Respir J 2008;32(4):924–930. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00167407

14. Taniguchi K., Okami J., Kodama K., et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer and its correlation to the response to gefitinib. Cancer Sci 2008;99(5):929–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00782.x

15. Chou T.Y., Chiu C.H., Li L.H., et al. Mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor is a predictive and prognostic factor for gefitinib treatment in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(10):3750–3757. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-1981

16. Grant M.J., Aredo J.V., Starrett J.H., et al. Efficacy of osimertinib in patients with lung cancer positive for uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations. Clini Cancer Res 2023;29(11):2123–2130. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3497

17. Carlson R.W., Jonasch E. NCCN evidence blocks. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14(5S):616–619. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2016.0177

18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Soft Tissue Sarcoma (Version 2.2024). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/sarcoma.pdf

19. Krämer A., Bochtler T., Pauli C., et al. Cancer of unknown primary: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023;34(3):228–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.013

20. Ba Y., Li H., Zhu J., et al. Case report: targeted sequencing improves the diagnosis of multiple synchronous lung cancers. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023;12(4):933–939. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-155

21. Cainap C., Balacescu O., Cainap S.S., Pop L.A. Next generation sequencing technology in lung cancer diagnosis. Biology (Basel) 2021;10(9):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10090864

22. Yang X., Yao Y., Zhu Q. A L833V/H835L EGFR variant lung adenocarcinoma with skin metastasis: A case report and literature review. Heliyon 2022;8(12):e12080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12080

23. Clery E., Pisapia P., Migliatico I., et al. Cytology meets next generation sequencing and liquid biopsy: A case of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as metastasis to the phalanx. Diagn Cytopathol 2020;48(8):759–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24438

24. Mao N., Liao Z., Wu J., et al. Diagnosis of NUT carcinoma of lung origin by next-generation sequencing: case report and review of the literature. Cancer Biol Ther 2019;20(2):150–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2018.1523852

25. Xu L., Li K., Chen X., et al. Next-generation sequencing assisted diagnosis of cervical metastasis in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A case report. Thoracic Cancer 2021;12(19):2622–2627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14143

26. Qian C., Dai N., Xu M., et al. ctDNA facilitated the diagnosis of a patient with synchronous urothelial carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer: case report. Ann Transl Med 2020;8(20):1323–1323. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6552

27. Wu D., Yu J., Guo L., et al. Analysis of primary synchronous breast invasive ductal carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma with next-generation sequencing: A case report. Oncol Lett 2022;25(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13604

28. Mitani Y., Kanai M., Kou T., et al. Cancer of unknown primary with EGFR mutation successfully treated with targeted therapy directed by clinical next-generation sequencing: a case report. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07640-4

29. Yang D.S., Huang K., Su M., et al. Next-generation sequencing revealed synchronous double primary lung squamous carcinoma: a case report. J Int Med Res 2021;49(5):3000605211018575. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211018575

30. Tan B., Jiang X., Wang R., et al. Genomic profiling reveals synchronous bilateral lung adenocarcinomas with distinct driver alterations of EML4-ALK or TPM3-ROS1 fusion: a case report. Front Oncol 2019;9:1319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01319

31. Liu S., Wang J., Luo X., et al. Coexistence of low-grade fetal adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ of the lung harboring different genetic mutations: a case report and review of literature. Onco Targets Ther 2020;13:6675–6680. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S260993

32. Liu C., Liu C., Zou X., et al. Next-generation sequencing facilitates differentiating between multiple primary lung cancer and intrapulmonary metastasis: a case series. Diagn Pathol 2021;16(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01083-6

33. Hu Y., Ren S., Chen C., et al. Metachronous primary lung adenocarcinomas harboring distinct KRAS mutations. Thoracic Cancer 2020;11(7):2018–2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13458

34. Ravella L., Barritault M., Bringuier P.P., et al. Multiple lung carcinoma: Primary or intrapulmonary metastasis? Ann Pathol 2018;38(3):202–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2018.02.001

35. Zhang X., Feng J., Su X., et al. Next generation sequencing reveals a synchronous trilateral lung adenocarcinoma case with distinct driver alterations of EGFR 19 deletion or EGFR 20 insertion or EZR-ROS1 fusion; Onco Targets Ther 2020;13:12667–12671. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S283617

36. Peng L., Zeng Z., Teng X., et al. Genomic profiling of synchronous triple primary tumors of the lung, thyroid and kidney in a young female patient: A case report. Oncol Lett 2018;16(5):6089–6094. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9334

37. Ouyang W.W., Li Q.Y., Yang W.G., et al. Genetic characteristics of a patient with multiple primary cancers: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2021;9(28):8563–8570. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8563

38. Qiu Y., Wang X., Fan Y., et al. A case of bilateral synchronous double primary lung cancer secondary to bladder cancer: from the next-generation sequencing prospect. Thorac Cancer 2023;14(14):1316–1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14864

39. Song I.H., Hong S.H., Lee K.Y., et al. Next generation sequencing can be helpful in histologic diagnosis: A case report of metastatic breast cancer mimicking atypical carcinoid tumor of lung. Pathol Res Pract 2020;216(5):152835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2020.152835

40. Kovács K.A., Hegedus B., Kenessey I., Tímár J. Tumor type-specific and skin region-selective metastasis of human cancers: another example of the “seed and soil” hypothesis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2013;32(3–4):493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-013-9418-8

41. Nguyen B., Fong C., Luthra A., et al. Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients. Cell 2022;185(3):563–575.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.003

42. Lookingbill D.P., Spangler N., Helm K.F. Cutaneous metastases in patients with metastatic carcinoma: A retrospective study of 4020 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;29(2Pt1):228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(93)70173-q

43. Pajaziti L., Hapçiu S.R., Dobruna S., et al. Skin metastases from lung cancer: a case report. BMC Res Notes 2015;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1105-0

44. Sugiura H., Yamada K., Sugiura T., et al. Predictors of survival in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(3):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0051-0

45. Mengoli M.C., Rossi G., Tiseo M., et al. ‘Turban-like’ skull metastasis from pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Thorax 2016;72(8):767–768. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209409

46. Turner R.C., Lucke-Wold B.P., Hwang R., Underwood B.D. Lung cancer metastasis presenting as a solitary skull mass. J Surg Case Rep 2016;2016(6):rjw116. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjw116

47. Todisco A., Internò V., Stucci L.S., et al. Cutaneous metastasis as a primary presentation of a pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma. Int J Biol Markers 2019;34(4):421–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1724600819877190

48. Zhou Z., Lin T., Chen S., et al. Omics-based molecular classifications empowering in precision oncology. Cell Oncol 2024;47(3):759–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-023-00912-8.