Preview

Malignant tumours

Advanced search

Application of the Node-RADS system for evaluation of regional lymph nodes based on computed tomography data in colon cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-024

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies of neoadjuvant therapy for colon cancer indicate a significant percentage of patients’ retreatment, more likely due to the low accuracy of radiation diagnostics. The new Node-RADS lymph node assessment system can allow for more accurate selection of patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, the efficiency of adjuvant chemotherapy has been reliably substantiated for N1 within three months, for N2 within 6 months, for NO-only in the presence of negative prognosis factors. This allows us to study the applicability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high reliability of lymph node involvement according to computed tomography data in the preoperative period.

Study objective: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of the Node-RADS system for predicting the risk of metastatic lymph node involvement in colon cancer patients.

Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of computed tomography and pathomorphological examination data was performed for 75 colon cancer patients operated on at the M. N. A. S. Loginov in the period from 2021 to 2023. The clinical stage was routinely established based on the results of computed tomography of the chest and abdomen with intravenous contrast. Restaging was performed in the same patients according to the Node-RADS system with a lymph node score of 1-5 points. The results of two radiation diagnostic methods were compared with the data of the pathomorphological examination of the surgical material.

Results: The accuracy (AUC) of computed tomography in the routine diagnostic method was 0.69. According to Node-RADS assessment, lymph nodes of 4-5 points were considered involved. Statistical analysis showed that the accuracy of this method increased significantly (AUC0.93). To determine the differences between the results of routine assessment, Node-RADS and the pathomorphological examination results, we found statistically significant (p < 0.0001) differences between the routine assessment and the results of pathomorphology, which corresponded to a low diagnostic value. At the same time, when comparing the results of the assessment according to Node-RADS and the conclusion of the pathomorphological study, no statistically significant differences were found (p = 0.109), which corresponded to sufficient diagnostic value of assessing the metastatic regional lymph nodes according to the Node-RADS criteria.

Conclusions: The Node-RADS system, presented as a universal system for assessing malignant lymph nodes shows a fairly high diagnostic potential.

About the Authors

M. A. Gorshkova
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Gorshkova Margarita Alekseevna

Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow HH23


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



N. N. Semenov
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Semenov Nikolai Nikolaevich

Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow HH23


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



M. A. Danilov
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Danilov Mikhail Aleksandrovich

Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow HH23


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



O. S. Vasnev
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Vasnev Oleg Sergeevich

Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow HH23


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



Yu. V. Kulezneva
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Kulezneva Yuliya Valerevna

Build. 1, 1 Novogireevskaya St., Moscow HH23


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



K. A. Lesko
A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Lesko Konstantin Aleksandrovich

1/1, Velozavodskaya St., Moscow 115280


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



V. A. Prosikov
City Clinical Hospital № 13
Russian Federation

1/1, Velozavodskaya St., Moscow 115280


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



References

1. Fedyanin M.Yu., Gladkov О. A., Gordeev S.S., et al. Practical recommendations for drug treatment of cancer of the colon, rectosigmoid junction and rectum. Zlokachestvennie opuholi = Malignant Tumors 2022;12(3s2):401-454 (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-401-454

2. Smith N.J., Bees N., Barbachano Y., et al. Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2007;96(7):1030—1036. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603646

3. Burton S., Brown G., Bees N., et al. Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer. Br J Radiol 2008;81(961):10-19. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19492531

4. Horvat N., Raj A., Liu S., et al. CT coIonography in preoperative staging of colon cancer: evaluation of FOxTROT inclusion criteria for neoadjuvant therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212(l):94—102. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.19928

5. Galia M., Midiri M., Carcione A., et al. Usefulness of CT coIonography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with distal occlusive colorectal carcinoma. Radiol Med 2001;101(4):235—242

6. De Gooyer J.M., Verstegen M.G., ‘t Lam-Boer J., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: anationwide propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Dig Surg 2020;37(4):292-301. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503446

7. Morton D., Seymour M., Magill L., et al. Preoperative chemotherapy for operable colon cancer: Mature results of an international randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(8):1541-1552. https://doi.org/10.3410/f742496355.793598125

8. Elsholtz F.H.J., Asbach P., Haas M., et al. Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer. Eur Radiol 2021;31(8):6116-6124. https://doi.org/10.1007/SOO33O-O21-O7795-z

9. Leonardo C., Flammia R.S., Lucciola S., et al. Performance of Node-RADS scoring system for a standardized assessment of regional lymph nodes in bladder cancer patients. Cancers 2023;15(3):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancersl5030580

10. Lucciola S., Pisciotti M.L., Frisenda M., et al. Predictive role of node-rads score in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection: comparative analysis with validated nomograms. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022;26(2):379-387. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00564-z

11. Meyer H.J., Schnarkowski B., Pappisch J., et al. CT texture analysis and node-RADS CT score of mediastinal lymph nodes-diagnostic performance in lung cancer patients. Cancer Imaging 2022;22(l):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644022-00506-x

12. Lim M., Hussain Z., Howe A., et al. The oncological outcome after right hemicolectomy and accuracy of CT scan as a preoperative tool for staging in right sided colonic cancers. Colorectal Dis 2013;15(2):536-43. https://doi.org/10.llll/codi.12061

13. Norgaard A., Dam C., Jakobsen A., et al. Selection of colon cancer patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy by preoperative CT scan. ScandJ Gastroenterol 2014;49(2):202-208. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2013.862294

14. Rollven E., Abraham-Nordling M., Holm T., Blomqvist L. Assessment and diagnostic accuracy oflymph node status to predict stage III colon cancer using computed tomography. Cancer Imaging 2017;17(l):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40644-016-0104-2

15. Rollven E., Blomqvist L., Oistamo E., et al. Morphological predictors for lymph node metastases on computed tomography in colon cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44(5):1712-1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01900-z

16. Karoui M., Rullier A., Piessen G., et al. Perioperative FOLFOX 4 versus FOLFOX 4 plus cetuximab versus immediate surgery for high-risk stage ii and iii colon cancers: a phase ii multicenter randomized controlled trial (PRODIGE 22). Ann Surg 2020;271(4):637-645. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003454

17. Foxtrot Collaborative Group. Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13(ll):1152—1160. https://doi.org/10.3166/cer-20180056

18. Seymour M.T., Morton D., International FOxTROT Trial Investigators. FOxTROT: an international randomised controlled trial in 1052 patients (pts) evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(15):suppl. 3504. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3504.


Review

For citations:


Gorshkova M.A., Semenov N.N., Danilov M.A., Vasnev O.S., Kulezneva Yu.V., Lesko K.A., Prosikov V.A. Application of the Node-RADS system for evaluation of regional lymph nodes based on computed tomography data in colon cancer patients. Malignant tumours. 2024;14(3):40-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-024

Views: 1696


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-5057 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6813 (Online)