Preview

Malignant tumours

Advanced search

Efficacy of first-line therapy in elderly patients with prostate cancer in real clinical practice

https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-018

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of first-line systemic therapy administered in real clinical practice to patients >75 years old with prostate cancer (PCa).

Material: the retrospective study included data from 315 patients >75 years old (median age — 84 (75-99) years) with hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPCa) who received antitumor therapy. Non-metastatic HSPCa (nmHSPCa) was observed in 223 (70,8%) patients, while metastatic HSPCa (mHSPCa) — in 92 (29,2%) patients. In 8 (3,6%) cases of nmHSPCa, bicalutamide monotherapy was prescribed, while androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered in 215 (96,4%) cases (intermittently — 164 (73,5%)). All 92 patients with mHSPC received ADT, including in combinations corresponding to current clinical recommendations — in 38 (41,3 %) cases (with docetaxel — 17 (18,4 %), abiraterone acetate — 7 (7,6 %), enzalutamide — 10 (10,9 %), apalutamide — 1 (1,1 %)). The median follow-up time for patients with nmHSPC was 64,2 (2,1-275,7) months, for patients with mHSPC — 48,6 (1,0-234,3) months.

Results: the median duration of the 1st line of therapy for nmHSPC was 40,6 (1,0-243,8) months. In nmHPRPC, PSA reduction by>90% during the first line of therapy was seen in 67,3 % of patients. Five-year survival of patients with nmHPRPC without PSA progression (PFPS) reached 70,8%, progression-free survival (PFS) — 70,8%, metastasis-free survival (MFS) — 85,0%, specific survival (SS) — 97,3% and overall (OS) — 91,5%. Continuous ADT in lowand intermediate-risk nmHPRPC reduced PFS compared to intermittent therapy (p = 0.014), but did not affect MFS, SS and OS. The median duration of the first line of therapy for mHPRPC was 14,3 (1,1-137,7) months. In mHSPC, the frequency of PSA decrease by>90% during the first line of therapy was 38,0%. In patients with mHSPC, the 4-year PFSSA was 50,1%, DFS — 50,1%, DFS — 83,5% and OS — 77,2%. In mHSPC, ADT compared with combination therapy reduced DFS (p = 0.018), DFS (p = 0.053) and OS (odds ratio 3.675 (95% confidence intervals: 1.001-13.489); p = 0.008). No significant effect of the combination drug on the survival of patients with mHSPC was found.

Conclusions: in elderly patients with nmHSPC, intermittent ADT is not inferior to continuous ADT in terms of OS. In patients > 75 years old, combination therapy based on ADT with docetaxel or androgen signal inhibitors provides an increased OS compared to ADT alone.

About the Authors

M. I. Volkova
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Volkova Mariya Igorevna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152; Build. 1,2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



M. Yu. Fedyanin
Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka”, Moscow Healthcare Department; N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of (Neology. Ministry of Health of Russia; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Fedyanin Mikhail Yurevich

8 Sosenskiy Stan St., Moscow 108814; 23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478;1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



I. A. Pokataev
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Pokataev Ilya Anatolevich

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



I. S. Al-Akel
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Al-Akel Ibragim Samerovich

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



S. G. Vardanyan
Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka”, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

8 Sosenskiy Stan St., Moscow 108814


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



Ya. V. Gridneva
Oncology Center No. 1 of the City Clinical Hospital named after S. S. Yudin of the Moscow Department of Health; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Gridneva Yana Vladimirovna

18A Zagorodnoe Shosse, Moscow 117152; Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest



References

1. Nosov D.A., Volkova M.I., Gladkov O.A., et al. Practical recommendations for drug treatment of prostate cancer. Zlokachestvennie opuholi = Malignant Tumors 2023;13(3s2):640-660 (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-50572023-13-3s2-l-640-660

2. NCCN guideline for prostate cancer. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/home

3. The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2022. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022 (In Russ.)

4. Sweeney C.J., Chen Y.H., Carducci M., et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373(8):737-46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoal503747

5. James N.D., Sydes M.R., Clarke N.W., et al. Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10024):1163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01037-5

6. Armstrong A.J., Szmulewitz R.Z., Petrylak D.P., et al. ARCHES: a randomized, phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy with enzalutamide or placebo in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(32):2974-86.https://doi.org/10.1200/JC0.19.00799

7. Davis I.D., Martin A.J., Stockler M.R., et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381(2):121-31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoal903835

8. Chi K.N., Agarwal N., Bjartell A., et al. Apalutamide for Metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381(l):13-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoal903307

9. Fizazi K., Tran N.P., Fein L., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(5):686-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30082-8

10. Smith MR, Hussain MHA, Saad F, et al.. Overall survival with darolutamide versus placebo in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in the phase 3 ARASENS trial. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:13-13.

11. Clarke N.W., Ali A., Ingleby F.C., et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in lowand high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann Oncol 2019;30(12):1992— 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz396

12. Schulman C., Cornel E., Matveev V., et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy in patients with relapsing or locally advanced prostate cancer: a phase 3b randomised study (ICELAND). Eur Urol 2016;69(4):720-727. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.007

13. D’Amico A.V., Chen M.H., Renshaw A., et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 2015;314(12):1291—3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.8577

14. Studer U.E., Whelan P., Wimpissinger F., et al. Differences in time to disease progression do not predict for cancer-specific survival in patients receiving immediate or deferred androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, final results of eortc randomized trial 30891 with 12 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 2014;66(5):829-838. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.024

15. Crook J.M., O’Callaghan C.J., Duncan G., et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy. N EnglJ Med 2012;367(10):895-903. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoal201546

16. Dong Z., Wang H., Xu M., et al. Intermittent hormone therapy versus continuous hormone therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: ameta-analysis. Aging Male 2015;18(4):233-237. https://doi.org/10.3109/13685538.2015.1065245

17. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html

18. Samson D.J., Seidenfeld J., Schmitt B., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy compared with combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95(2):361-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr,10647

19. Chowdhury S., Bjartell A., Agarwal N., et al. Deep, rapid, and durable prostate-specific antigen decline with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy is associated with longer survival and improved clinical outcomes in TITAN patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2023;34(5):477-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. annonc.2023.02.009

20. Gomez-Veiga F., Szmulewitz R.Z., Holzbeierlein J., et al. Clinical outcomes of enzalutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in patients aged <75 and >75 years: ARCHES post hoc analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024;7(4):860-869. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.ll.012

21. Lage D.E., Michaelson M.D., Lee R.J., et al. Outcomes of older men receiving docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021;24(4):1181-1188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00389-2

22. Mori K., Mostafaei H., S ari Motlagh R., et al. Systemic therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: network meta-analysis. BJU Int 2022;129(4):423-433. https://doi.org/10.llll/bju.15507

23. Parker C.C., James N.D., Brawley C.D., et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): arandomised controlledphase 3 trial. Lancet 2018;392(10162):2353-2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32486-3

24. Bossi A., Foulon S., Maldonado X., et al. Prostate irradiation in men with de novo, low-volume, metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Results of PEACE-1, a phase 3 randomized trial with a 2x2 design. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(17_suppl). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA5000.


Review

For citations:


Volkova M.I., Fedyanin M.Yu., Pokataev I.A., Al-Akel I.S., Vardanyan S.G., Gridneva Ya.V. Efficacy of first-line therapy in elderly patients with prostate cancer in real clinical practice. Malignant tumours. 2024;14(3):7-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2024-018

Views: 222


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-5057 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6813 (Online)