Preview

Malignant tumours

Advanced search

Retrospective analysis of BUCEN score prognostic value in Russian population of patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with mitotane

https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2026-076

Abstract

Introduction. Currently, the algorithm for selecting first-line treatment for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is not clearly defined; the choice between mitotane monotherapy and its combination with platinum-based chemotherapy remains controversial. In a large retrospective study (n = 439), the BUCEN scoring system was proposed as a predictor of treatment response, which could help determine first-line therapy [9]. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the BUCEN scores in the Russian population of patients with advanced ACC, treated with a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and mitotane.
Materials and Methods. This retrospective single-center study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with advanced ACC and pre-assessed BUCEN scores who received platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with mitotane at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology between 2016 and 2025.
Result. The study included 63 patients with BUCEN scores of 0–2 (n = 31; 49.2 %) and ≥ 3 (n = 32; 50.8 %). Fifty patients (79.4 %) received etoposide + cisplatin + doxorubicin (EDP), 5 patients (7.9 %) received etoposide + cisplatin (EP), and 8 (12.7 %) received etoposide + carboplatin (EC). Therapeutic serum levels of mitotane were achieved in 42 patients (66.7 %). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) at ≥ 6 months, and DCR at ≥ 12 months were 20.6 %, 62.3 %, and 26.3 %, respectively. A BUCEN score of 0–2 was associated with an improved ORR (p = 0.03), a DCR at ≥ 6 months (p < 0.01), and a DCR at ≥ 12 months (p = 0.03). A multivariate analysis revealed that non-anthracycline regimens in patients with BUCEN ≥ 3 were associated with a statistically significant decrease in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A statistically significant OS improvement was observed in patients with recurrence-free survival of ≥ 12 months post-adrenalectomy (p = 0.04).
Conclusion. The BUCEN scoring system is reproducible, simple to use, and could be applied for the stratification of patients with advanced ACC. Implementation of this system in clinical practice to pre-select patients for mitotane monotherapy as a first-line treatment requires prospective validation. The significantly poorer outcomes in the EP / EC group may partly reflect patient characteristics, as these regimens were used in those with contraindications to anthracyclines or cisplatin. However, based on our data, we do not recommend non-anthracycline regimens in patients without contraindications to EDP chemotherapy.

About the Authors

Ya. A. Zhulikov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Yaroslav Andreevich Zhulikov 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. V. Artamonova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia ; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia ; Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute named after M. F. Vladimirsky
Russian Federation

Elena Vladimirovna Artamonova 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997 

Build 1, 61 / 2 Shchepkina St., Moscow 129110 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



A. Yu. Kolycheva
N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Angelina Yuryevna Kolycheva 

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. I. Kovalenko
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Elena Igorevna Kovalenko 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



V. Yu. Bokhyan
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia ; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Vahan Yurikovich Bokhyan 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. V. Evdokimova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Ekaterina Vadimovna Evdokimova 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



E. S. Kolobanova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Evgenia Sergeevna Kolobanova 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



O. A. Martynova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Olga Andreevna Martynova 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



D. V. Rogozhin
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry Viktorovich Rogozhin 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



V. A. Gorbunova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Vera Andreevna Gorbunova 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



I. S. Stilidi
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia ; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Ivan Sokratovich Stilidi 

23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.



References

1. Schteingart D.E., Doherty G.M., Gauger P.G., et al. Management of patients with adrenal cancer: recommendations of an international consensus conference. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005;12(3):667–680. https://doi.org/10.1677/erc.1.01029

2. Margonis G.A., Kim Y., Prescott J.D., et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: impact of surgical margin status on long-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(1):134–141. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4803-x

3. Icard P., Goudet P., Charpenay C., et al. Adrenocortical carcinomas: surgical trends and results of a 253-patient series from the French Association of Endocrine Surgeons study group. World J Surg 2001;25(7):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0047-y

4. Toke J., Uhlyarik A., Lohinszky J., et al. Prognostic factors and mitotane treatment of adrenocortical cancer: two decades of experience from an institutional case series. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:952418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.952418

5. Megerle F., Herrmann W., Schloetelburg W., et al. Mitotane monotherapy in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103(4):1686–1695. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02591

6. Zhulikov Ya.A., Kovalenko E.I., Bohyan V.Yu., et al. Efficacy of EDP ± mitotane chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Predictive and prognostic factors of efficacy. Malignant tumours 2021;11(1):37–46 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2021-11-1-37-46

7. Libé R., Borget I., Ronchi C.L., et al. Prognostic factors in stage III–IV adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC): an European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumor (ENSAT) study. Ann Oncol 2015;26(11):2119–2125. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv329

8. Fassnacht M., Terzolo M., Allolio B., et al. Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2012;366(23):2189–2197. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200966

9. Mangone A., Ronchi C.L., Terzolo M., et al. Clinical predictors of treatment response in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a multicentre ENSAT study. ESMO Open 2025. https://doi.org/10.1530/endoabs.110.OC1.5

10. Zhulikov Ya.A., Artamonova E.V., Kovalenko E.I., et al. Prospective, single-center, phase II study to standardize the mitotane dosing regimen in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment for adrenocortical cancer. Voprosy Onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2026;72(1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2026-72-1-OF-2404(InRuss.).


Review

For citations:


Zhulikov Ya.A., Artamonova E.V., Kolycheva A.Yu., Kovalenko E.I., Bokhyan V.Yu., Evdokimova E.V., Kolobanova E.S., Martynova O.A., Rogozhin D.V., Gorbunova V.A., Stilidi I.S. Retrospective analysis of BUCEN score prognostic value in Russian population of patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with mitotane. Malignant tumours. 2026;16(2):35-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2026-076

Views: 217

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-5057 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6813 (Online)