<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">tumors</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Malignant tumours</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Malignant tumours</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2224-5057</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-6813</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rosoncoweb</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18027/2224-5057-2019-9-4-70-74</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">tumors-696</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МНЕНИЕ ЭКСПЕРТА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>EXPERT OPINION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Периоперационное использование анти-EGFR-антител при операбельных и потенциально операбельных метастазах колоректального рака в печень. Оправдывает ли повышение резектабельности возможные риски?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Perioperative use of anti-EGFR antibodies in resectable and potentially resectable liver metastases</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жуков</surname><given-names>Н. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhukov</surname><given-names>N.  V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Николай В. Жуков, д. м. н., руководитель отдела междисциплинарной онкологии; доцент кафедры онкологии, гематологии и лучевой терапии</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nikolay V. Zhukov, MD, PhD, DSc, Head of the Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology; Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Hematology and Radiation Therapy</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУ «НМИЦ детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии им. Дмитрия Рогачева» Минздрава России;&#13;
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский центр им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology;&#13;
N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Жуков Н.В., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Жуков Н.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zhukov N.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/696">https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/article/view/696</self-uri><abstract><p>Радикальное удаление всех видимых проявлений заболевания позволяет значимо улучшить прогноз больных метастатическим колоректальным раком, однако тотальная метастазэктомия изначально возможна лишь у небольшой доли больных, при этом у многих из них в дальнейшем развивается рецидив. С целью увеличения числа больных, подлежащих радикальному вмешательству, и снижения риска последующего рецидива в рутинной практике широко используется предоперационная химиотерапия (с или без последующего адъювантного лечения). В надежде на улучшение непосредственной эффективности (увеличение частоты R0 резекции) и отдаленных результатов лечения предоперационную химиотерапию зачастую дополняют биологическими агентами (анти-EGFR и анти-VEGF моноклональными антителами), в ряде случаев продолжая их использование и после операции (периоперационная терапия). Однако, несмотря на имеющиеся доказательства увеличения резектабельности, полноценная информация о влиянии такого подхода на отдаленные результаты лечения до настоящего времени отсутствовала. Анализ последних исследований в данной области ставит под сомнение безопасность периоперационного использования анти-EGFR антител у больных с потенциально излечимым метастатическим колоректальном раком.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The radical resection of all visible disease manifestations can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, however, complete metastasectomy is initially possible only in a small proportion of patients, with many of them subsequently developing relapse. Aiming to increase the number of patients subject to radical intervention and to reduce the recurrence risk, preoperative chemotherapy (with or without subsequent adjuvant treatment) is widely used in routine practice. In the hope of increasing immediate effectiveness (increasing the proportion of patients subject to R0 resection) and the long-term results of treatment, preoperative chemotherapy is often accompanied with biological agents (anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies) continued after surgery in some cases. However, despite the evidence of increased resectability, the impact of this approach on long-term treatment outcomes has not yet been determined. The analysis of recent studies in this area doubts the safety of perioperative use of anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with potentially curable metastatic colorectal cancer.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>колоректальный рак</kwd><kwd>метастазы в печень</kwd><kwd>цетуксимаб</kwd><kwd>панитумумаб</kwd><kwd>резекция</kwd><kwd>предоперационная терапия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>colorectal cancer</kwd><kwd>liver metastases</kwd><kwd>cetuximab</kwd><kwd>panitumumab</kwd><kwd>resection</kwd><kwd>preoperative therapy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kanas GP, Taylor A, Primrose JN, et al. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and metaanalysis of prognostic factors. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 283 – 301.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kanas GP, Taylor A, Primrose JN, et al. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and metaanalysis of prognostic factors. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 283 – 301.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13 (10):1261 – 1268. doi:10.1245 / s10434‑006‑9023‑y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13 (10):1261 – 1268. doi:10.1245 / s10434‑006‑9023‑y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised c ontrolled trial. Lancet 2008;371: 1007 – 16</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised c ontrolled trial. Lancet 2008;371: 1007 – 16</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sorbye H, Mauer M, Gruenberger T, et al. Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983).Ann Surg 2012; 255: 534 – 39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorbye H, Mauer M, Gruenberger T, et al. Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983).Ann Surg 2012; 255: 534 – 39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO, et al. Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11 (1):38 – 47. doi:10.1016 / S1470–2045 (09) 70330 – 4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO, et al. Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11 (1):38 – 47. doi:10.1016 / S1470–2045 (09) 70330 – 4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petrelli, F., &amp; Barni, S. (2012). Resectability and outcome with anti-EGFR agents in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases: a meta-analysis. International journal of colorectal disease, 27 (8), 997 – 1004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrelli, F., &amp; Barni, S. (2012). Resectability and outcome with anti-EGFR agents in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases: a meta-analysis. International journal of colorectal disease, 27 (8), 997 – 1004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC – C Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25 (30):4779 – 4786. doi:10.1200 / JCO. 2007.11.3357</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC – C Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25 (30):4779 – 4786. doi:10.1200 / JCO. 2007.11.3357</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (23):2335 – 2342. doi:10.1056 / NEJMoa032691</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (23):2335 – 2342. doi:10.1056 / NEJMoa032691</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (23):2335 – 2342. doi:10.1056 / NEJMoa032691</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (23):2335 – 2342. doi:10.1056 / NEJMoa032691</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Petrelli F, et al. First-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in panRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96 (1):156 – 166. doi:10.1016 / j. critrevonc. 2015.05.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Petrelli F, et al. First-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in panRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96 (1):156 – 166. doi:10.1016 / j. critrevonc. 2015.05.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sorich MJ, Wiese MD, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS. Extended RAS mutations and antiEGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 (1):13 – 21. doi:10.1093 / annonc / mdu378</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorich MJ, Wiese MD, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS. Extended RAS mutations and antiEGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 (1):13 – 21. doi:10.1093 / annonc / mdu378</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bridgewater JA Pugh SA Maishman T et al. Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (New EPOC): long-term results of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020; (published online Jan 31) https://doi.org / 10.1016 / S1470–2045 (19) 30798 – 3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bridgewater JA Pugh SA Maishman T et al. Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (New EPOC): long-term results of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020; (published online Jan 31) https://doi.org / 10.1016 / S1470–2045 (19) 30798 – 3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Primrose J, Falk S, Finch-Jones M, et al. Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis: the New EPOC randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 601 – 11</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Primrose J, Falk S, Finch-Jones M, et al. Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis: the New EPOC randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 601 – 11</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dahan L, Sadok A, Formento JL, Seitz JF, Kovacic H. Modulation of cellular redox state underlies antagonism between oxaliplatin and cetuximab in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158 (2):610 – 620. doi:10.1111 / j.1476 – 5381.2009.00341. x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dahan L, Sadok A, Formento JL, Seitz JF, Kovacic H. Modulation of cellular redox state underlies antagonism between oxaliplatin and cetuximab in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158 (2):610 – 620. doi:10.1111 / j.1476 – 5381.2009.00341. x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, et al. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14 (8):749 – 759. doi:10.1016 / S1470–2045 (13) 70163 – 3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, et al. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14 (8):749 – 759. doi:10.1016 / S1470–2045 (13) 70163 – 3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science. 2007;316 (5827):1039 – 1043. doi:10.1126 / science. 1141478</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science. 2007;316 (5827):1039 – 1043. doi:10.1126 / science. 1141478</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taïeb J, Tabernero J, Mini E, et al. Subgroup analyses results of the PETACC8 phase III trial comparing adjuvant FOLFOX4 with or without cetuximab in resected stage III colon cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 31 (suppl): 3525 (abstr).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taïeb J, Tabernero J, Mini E, et al. Subgroup analyses results of the PETACC8 phase III trial comparing adjuvant FOLFOX4 with or without cetuximab in resected stage III colon cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 31 (suppl): 3525 (abstr).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, Nair S, et al. Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307 (13):1383 – 1393. doi:10.1001 / jama. 2012.385</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alberts SR, Sargent DJ, Nair S, et al. Effect of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with or without cetuximab on survival among patients with resected stage III colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307 (13):1383 – 1393. doi:10.1001 / jama. 2012.385</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gholami, S., &amp; Grothey, A. (2020). EGFR antibodies in resectable metastatic colorectal liver metastasis: more harm than benefit?. The Lancet Oncology. Published: January 31, 2020DOI: https://doi.org / 10.1016 / S1470–2045 (20) 30003 – 6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gholami, S., &amp; Grothey, A. (2020). EGFR antibodies in resectable metastatic colorectal liver metastasis: more harm than benefit?. The Lancet Oncology. Published: January 31, 2020DOI: https://doi.org / 10.1016 / S1470–2045 (20) 30003 – 6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
